When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 29, 2016, around 18:21, the Defendant acquired 1,000,000,000,000 won of the market price of the victim B’s loss in front of the ticket box of the former bus public bus terminal located in 30, Jin-jin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

The defendant did not take necessary procedures such as returning the acquired goods to the victim, but did so.

In this respect, the defendant embezzled the property to deviate from the possession of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. B Written statements;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (CCTV verification, etc.) and CCTV video data;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. On April 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with the victim’s 1 million won Nowon-gu one, the market price of which was set off above the front line of the ticket box for the purchase of boarding tickets, around the front line bus public terminal box box of Jeon-jin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on April 18:21, 2016.

2. 판단 피해자는 노트북을 매표소 앞 선반 위에 보관할 의사로 노트북을 선반 위에 놓은 채 자리를 떠난 것은 아니라, 선반 위에 놓은 노트북을 깜빡 잊은 채 자리를 떠났다가 약 40분 가량이 지나서야 노트북을 잃어 버렸다는 사실을 알아차리고 그곳으로 돌아온 점, 시외버스터미널은 불특정 다수의 사람이 왕래하는 곳으로 특정인의 배타적인 지배 영역이라고 보기 어려운 점 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인이 노트북을 가져갈 시점에서 노트북은 이미 피해자의 의사에 의하지 않고 점유를 떠난 물건이라고 봄이 타당하다.

There is no evidence to find otherwise that the Nowon-do still has been in possession of the victim.

Therefore, the defendant's act constitutes larceny.