If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who raises a string of a horse.

On October 30, 2016, the Defendant was responsible for the opening and calculation of the Defendant’s book in the area of the sports-for-all small park located in the Dong-dong Dong-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do.

There was a duty of care to prevent one's dog in advance against others by taking measures such as putting a dog over or putting a dog over the dog to the person who raises a dog because he or she is a place where he or she takes books.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim to go on by asking the left side buckbucks of the victim C, where the Defendant opened a buck, and she saw the victim to suffer on the left side bucks which need to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The medical certificate of injury and each photograph [the defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant's opening did not ask the victim. However, the defendant and his defense counsel argued to the effect that the defendant did not ask the victim, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, i.e., where the statement of the victim et al. is mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, unless there is any separate reliable evidence to deem that the victim's statement is objectively acceptable in light of the facts charged (see Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). The victim's statement has been consistently and consistently made from the investigative agency to the court, and there is no circumstance to suspect the credibility of the victim's statement, such as the existence of any inconsistency between each statement and the objective fact, and the victim's statement conforms to the victim's diagnosis and the victim's photograph.