F, G, H, and I shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

F, G, H, and I shall not pay each of the above penalties.

Defendants shall leave from the office of the Gyeonggi-do Office for the protection of office buildings in total three times from around 19:49 to 20:03 on May 13, 2014, with 20 persons, such as L of the branch office L of the non-regular labor union, the head of the site M, and N of the non-regular labor union, as well as the 17:0 on May 13, 2014, the building management company of the Gyeonggi-do Human Resources Development Institute of Facilities and Services in Gyeonggi-do, which is a building managed by the victims of Gyeonggi-do, located in Suwon-gu, Gyeonggi-do.

Even though the Gu received the Gu, it did not comply with it without justifiable reasons until 20:20 on the same day.

As a result, Defendants jointly with the above L, M, N, etc. and leave the part of the victim Gyeonggi-do without any justifiable reason.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness P, Q andO;

1. A copy of each police statement of P andO (including the part on the statement written by Q);

1. A report on investigation (report on information status);

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing cinematographic USB;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Punishment of Specific Crimes, Article 319 (2) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Punishment defendant A, B, C, D, and E to be suspended from sentence: 500,00 won per fine; and

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A, B, C, D, and E): 100,000 won per day);

1. Defendant A, B, C, D, and E of the suspended sentence: The basic facts of the above Defendants under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act are generally recognized; Defendant A has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; Defendant B, C, D, and E are primary offenders; and the conflict caused by dismissal can be resolved due to the reinstatement of all the above Defendants after the instant case; and the age, character, environment, motive, and means leading up to the instant crime.