However, even though there are no roads and current status, it is impossible to obtain permission from the owner of the land, and it is not possible to obtain permission from the Korea Rural Community Corporation.

2. C, a seller’s broker, demanded KRW 5 million as a commission and paid KRW 3 million in excess of the statutory brokerage commission.

3. The buyer D demanded 3 million won as a brokerage commission and paid 2 million won in excess of the statutory brokerage commission.

Inasmuch as “a letter of accusation” was drawn up.

However, the facts are as follows: H and I introduced the above land at the time of an on-site investigation by the Defendant: (a) provided an explanation about the above land from H and I; (b) did not have any explanation as to the content of the accusation statement from C; (c) it was possible for the Defendant to obtain permission to use the current status of ownership of the Korea Rural Community Corporation; (d) the above land was allowed to obtain permission to engage in development activities using F land as the current status of ownership of the Korea Rural Community Corporation (it was June 4, 2015), and this contract was independently arranged by C, and C did not demand that the Defendant pay KRW 1 million to C as a brokerage commission, and D did not demand that the Defendant pay KRW 3 million as a brokerage commission, and the Defendant did not demand that D sold the above land to D and paid KRW 1 million as working expenses.

The defendant is a public official in a name in the general civil petition office of the Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-ro, Hongcheon-ro, Hongcheon-ro, Hongcheon-gun, the same day.