However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who works as a daily worker, and C is a person who works as a “D Mart” employee.

Real estate lessor E, loan hubF, etc.: (a) concluded a loan agreement with a new cooperative or credit cooperative, etc. where the examination of documents on loan is relatively difficult; (b) made a loan on the basis of a false loan agreement; and (c) made it illegal; and (c) accordingly, E purchased a loan on the condition that the lessor, lessee, etc. take over the obligations of the deposit money for the lease on a deposit basis; and (c) through Dong G, F, H, and I made the role of preparing a loan agreement with K of the Credit Cooperative in the victim J.J. and taking charge of the duties related to the loan; (d) L, M, and N, etc. as seen above, the Defendant and the aforementioned lender played the role of applying for the loan of the lease on a deposit basis of the lease agreement written in a false manner, and (e) obtained the said loan agreement from the president in sequence by preparing internal documents as if an application for the loan was made normally, and (e) obtaining the said loan from the president in order to obtain approval.

1. On October 27, 2014, in accordance with the above public offering, C’s crime on multi-household housing in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, prepares a loan application for loan of KRW 1500,000,000,000 for loan and a loan transaction agreement, etc. at the victim J-gu’s credit cooperative office located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P on October 27, 2014, and as seen above, E is a legitimate applicant for loan loan by attaching a multi-household loan agreement (Article Qu No. 106, 101,00,000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000).