손해배상(의)
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 12,747,560 to the Plaintiff and the period from October 19, 2016 to February 18, 2020.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On September 7, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in Defendant C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant C Hospital”) and was discharged on October 8, 2015 from Defendant B, who was an out-of-the-door surgery and doctor of Defendant C Hospital, on September 8, 2015 (hereinafter “the first operation”); and on September 17, 2015, the Plaintiff was discharged from the second operation of the knee-pnee-pnee-packing knee-packing (hereinafter “the second operation”).
B. On June 21, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and received from Defendant B the same day the removal of leapule and leapule using the diameter (hereinafter “third operation”), and discharged on July 8, 2016.
C. On October 19, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital; on October 20, 2016, the Plaintiff undergone a leapule and chlorate removal operation (hereinafter “fourth surgery”) from Defendant B; and discharged the Plaintiff on November 29, 2016.
On February 27, 2017, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was discharged on February 28, 2017 from Defendant B to undergo a washing and removal of infections (hereinafter “five-dimensional surgery”), and on April 11, 2017.
E. On October 11, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on October 11, 2017; (b) performed a removal operation from Defendant B on October 17, 2017 (hereinafter “six-party operation”); and (c) “seven-party operation on December 26, 2017 at the right right knee-free knee-off knee-offing operation.”
Upon receipt of each order, the discharge was made on February 2, 2018. [Grounds for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 4 (including each serial number, hereinafter the same shall apply).
each entry, the purport of the whole pleading
2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion
A. As to the Defendants’ negligence, the Plaintiff was infected by the first surgery, even before the first and second surgery, and there was no infection in conformity with the operation department. Despite the absence of any special sulopic symptoms, immediately after the first and second surgery, and the first and second surgery continued to have been infected by the Plaintiff. As such, the Defendants were infected by the first and second surgery.