[200 order 209] The defendant and the victim B (n, 63 years old) are the relationship between the defendant and the victim (n, 63 years old).

1. On February 20, 2020, the Defendant: (a) destroyed a special property damage to a police officer on February 2, 2020; (b) caused the damage to KRW 250,00 of the repair cost by throwing away a stone, which was parked at the victim’s front parking lot for the Espo-dong, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, on the ground that the victim was not able to keep himself/herself in the front parking lot; and (c) caused the damage to the victim’s car, which was dangerous

2. On March 5, 2020, around 13:20 on March 5, 2020, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the repair cost of KRW 250,000 by releasing a dangerous article on the victim’s possession, which was parked in the apartment Ddong parking lot as set forth in paragraph (1), from the apartment Ddong parking lot as set forth in paragraph (1) for the said reasons; and (b) destroyed it by removing the dangerous article on the glass window.

3. On March 8, 2020, around 18:29 on March 8, 2020, the Defendant damaged 600,000 won of the repair cost by throwing away the stones, which are dangerous objects in the front and rear glass of the said car, which were parked at the said apartment Ddong parking lot for the said reasons.

[20Dadan316] On June 9, 2020, around 13:25, 2020, the Defendant was called to the scene after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant was the Defendant and the Sinb in the Felon in order to take a drinking test by inserting four times in total, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, and photographing the Defendant’s face at the Defendant’s entrance from the guard of the Gabaon Police Station in the Jung-Eup Police Station in order to drive the scene without drinking, and the Defendant was demanded to comply with the drinking test by inserting the whole lab on four occasions.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to disclose his/her personal information, and did not explicitly comply with a police officer’s request for a sobreath test.

Summary of Evidence

[200 Highest 209]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B;

1. An investigation report (personal information on the owner of a vehicle);