However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who had operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “C” in Kimpo-si B and 3.

From Apr. 2013 to Oct. 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) installed three smuggling with simple intrusion; (b) hired female employees, and had them find out their names; (c) received cash of KRW 70,000 per time from male customers, or KRW 100,000 per cash, and had them do similar intercourse or sexual intercourse; and (d) assisted sexual intercourse by paying money of KRW 40,000 per time from among the sexual intercourses received from customers to female employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of investigative reports (Calculation of profits from sexual traffic) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., that the defendant repents his mistake and again does not engage in such illegal business, and that there exists no record of punishment for the same crime);

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;