1) The Defendant Company’s contract relation 1) from STX Construction Co., Ltd. “Innocent 900 tons of innovation,” the Defendant Company’s “this case’s scrap.”

(B) On December 20, 201, the instant electrical construction works were awarded a contract for the installation work (hereinafter “instant electrical construction”).

2) ELC Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”).

The main contents are as follows. - Construction cost: USD 1,751,313 - Construction period: From December 20, 2011 to June 30, 2012 - Period of warranty liability: Two years after the completion of a trial operation: In the case of supply place: 2 years after the completion of a trial operation - Employees A of STX Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., 740 in the special shipbuilding zone, in the case of Gyeongnam-gun-gun, Gyeong-gun-gun, the ship owner, etc., prepared a confirmation document to the effect that the instant corporation completed the instant electrical construction on February 22, 2013, and the confirmation document stated that safety inspection under the Occupational Safety and Health Act was completed on October 10, 2012.

3) In the process of performing the electric device installation control service from the Defendant Company, ZSA Co., Ltd., which was awarded a subcontract for the electrical device installation control service from the Defendant Company, had signed the Defendant Company’s total of 18 days from September 23, 2012 to October 10, 2012 to confirm the completion of trial operation of the instant while the Defendant Company signed the Defendant Company’s completion certificate of trial operation to confirm the completion of trial operation of the instant scrap. 4) Although the Defendant Company completed the instant construction work, it did not pay USD 60,578.17 out of the construction price of the instant limited construction.

On March 30, 2015, the instant limited liability company transferred the claim for the construction cost to the Defendant Company to the Plaintiff Company, and the Plaintiff Company delegated the notification of the transfer of the construction cost to the Defendant Company, notified the notification thereof to the Defendant Company on April 27, 2015, and reached the Defendant Company around that time.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute;