As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the 14th day of the above victims, such as fluoral salt in need of treatment.

2. Direct evidence consistent with the fact that the Defendants assaulted E, as stated in the facts charged, there is a statement in the investigation agency and court of E and in the investigation agency of E’s mother-friendly F.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record are as follows: ① “E is not a police officer after the dispatch of the police officer, and only six persons were asked for violence before the dispatch of the police officer (at the time of the case, 2 men and women were 3 people and 5 women at the time of the case) and did not make a concrete statement from whom they were assaulted from whom they were used during the investigation stage to this court; ② “E is a minor 2-3 soldiers at the time of the incident, and Defendant A’s face is not memoryd at all, and Defendant B was unable to memory at all, despite the fact that the Defendant was frightened by the violence of the Defendant on the day of the case, despite the fact that the police officer was frightened before the dispatch of the police officer, there was no assault by the police officer; ③ “E is not a frighter, and there was no assault by the Defendants on the road floor, but the Defendants did not have a fright to take the e-mail’s photograph at the time of the case.”