beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고단2128

변호사법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

320 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged was corrected ex officio to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's defense right.

D From April 2, 2002, from around 1993, it shall be the F apartment house reconstruction and rearrangement project partnership (hereinafter referred to as the “instant partnership”) around April 2, 2002.

() From the company that entered into a contract for the specialized management service with the company that entered into a rearrangement project with the company as vice president on August 31, 2010, the company was in fact engaged in the overall business of the instant association even after the withdrawal. G is a person who operates the company in charge of the management of the instant association in Gyeonggi-si, H and Seocho-gu, Seoul, I 1307 to 1309, and K is a person who operates the company in charge of the management of the creative manufacturing business, and K is a person who operates the company in charge of the business of water supply and drainage and removal of water supply and drainage and removal from the 503th fiveth floor of Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, and the defendant is a person who, without a certain occupation, was involved in the instant

1. The Defendant offered money and valuables in the name of solicitation for the Chang Ho Construction Project with the said D to receive money and valuables from G operating the Chang Ho Construction Project Co., Ltd. under the pretext of allowing the instant partnership to receive orders for the Changho Construction Project.

Accordingly, around May 201, the Defendant demanded the said G to offer money in favor of the executives of the instant association, including the president of the instant association, in solicitation of the said association via the said D, to receive orders from the instant association, etc., and received KRW 50 million from the said G on or around July 2011 under the pretext of soliciting orders for creative construction from the instant association.

In addition, from around that time to September 2014, the Defendant received a total of KRW 270,000,000 from the above G in the same manner eight times in the same manner as the list of crimes in attached Form (1) from around that time to around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant is recruited with the above D, or a public official alone.