The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of violating the Infant Care Act due to the receipt of false subsidies among the facts charged in the instant case.

In so determining, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding Article 54(2)1 of the Infant Care Act and the principle of statutoryism, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.