beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.12 2012고정5658

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:00 on April 10, 2012, the Defendant, in front of “D” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, inflicted injury on the victim E, i.e., the victim’s f and the Defendant’s face at the toilet, she found out that the victim’s f and the Defendant’s face were released along with the toilet, and she went beyond the Defendant’s face at least 10 times due to drinking, she went beyond the Defendant’s face, face, side she, etc., and she took her face over 5 times by drinking the victim’s clothes and face her face at least 4 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of injury diagnosis certificate and copy of medical examination and treatment certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserted that the judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was only made by the victim, and that the victim did not suffer any injury by taking time. However, according to each of the evidence (e.g., a death diagnosis certificate, a copy of the medical examination certificate, etc.) of the judgment, the injury diagnosis date of the victim was April 11, 2012, the following day of the instant case (e.g., the date of issuance of the medical examination). The victim stated that the victim was suffering from the first investigation at the police on April 25, 2012, that it was difficult to find out the records of the accident that could cause any injury before the date of the instant case ( April 10, 2012). In full view of the methods and circumstances leading up to the injury of the victim and the victim, the method and degree of the injury of the victim cannot be seen as the damage of the victim, as a whole.