beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.05.30 2018가합20440

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A’s spouse, Plaintiff B, and C are children of the network E, and Defendant D D A’s farming association corporation (hereinafter “Defendant corporation”) is a business entity that operates accommodation facilities (hereinafter “instant accommodation facilities”) in the name of “G camping site” from Yangyang-gun, Gangwon-do. Defendant Gangwon-do is a management authority of “H” (hereinafter “instant river”) which is a local river that flows before the instant accommodation facilities, and Defendant Yangyang-gun is a local government entrusted with the management of the instant river by Defendant Gangwon-do.

B. On July 15, 2017, the network E and the Plaintiffs, together with Plaintiff A’s middle school alumni, have been traveling one-day and two-day family in the instant accommodation. From 11:00 to 12:00, the Plaintiff started water play in the river area (hereinafter “the instant river area”) on the water side of the instant river area in front of the instant accommodation facilities.

C. The deceased J, along with Plaintiff B and C, went into the river area of this case without wearing protective equipment such as life jackets in order to get a water knee in the waterside of the river area of this case, and went into the center of the river area of this case due to an unforeseen cause. On 13:53 at around 13:53, the GJ, who searched a single unit of the river area of this case, went into the center of the river area of this case, went into the river area of this case, and went into the center of the river area of this case. Around 30 meters away from the center of the river where the water play at around 30 meters away from the center of the river where the water play at around 13:53, he was unable to recover consciousness, but the first responder, who was dispatched after receiving a report, did not perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation and sent it to the deceased hospital, but was killed at around 15:30 of the above hospital.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). [The grounds for recognition] Gap evidence 14, 5, and 6, Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 1, Eul 11, and 19, respectively;