The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendant

A is a person who was working as a general manager of the council of occupants' representatives in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant B is a person who worked as the head of the above apartment 102 Ban, and F is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment.

The Defendants had a serious conflict with the council of occupants' representatives of the said apartment due to the removal of fences between the said apartment and the said apartment.

1. Defendant A

A. On February 23, 2010, the Defendant, the head of the above G apartment site office, at the above apartment site office, destroyed the honor of the members of the council of occupants' representatives, including the victim F, who is the member of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment, by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “The council of occupants' representatives, who received a bribe from the above G apartment on the side of the above G apartment as a condition for the removal of fences, shall not be allowed until the end, and shall clarify the irregularities and influences of the council of occupants' representatives.”

B. (1) On April 2, 2010, the Defendant arbitrarily removed the paper No. 14 as “in relation to the request for consultation on the individual heating construction system and the re-consultation,” prepared and attached on the wall of the above apartment elevator at the site of the above apartment elevator, from the wall of the council of occupants’ representatives,” at the same month.

4. On the 15:46th day of the above apartment elevator, the paper paper Nos. A4 of the same item as the above-mentioned 1 (1) and attached by the council of occupants' representatives on the wall of the above apartment elevator was removed on the wall. 3th day of the same month on the 11:20th day of the same month, at the wall of the above apartment elevator, the paper No. A4 of the item “the notification of non-acceptance of retaining wall removal and re-consultation” prepared and attached by the council of

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the apartment management business of the above apartment council by force, and at the same time, damaged the property by impairing the utility of the document.

2...