(a) as shown in the reasons for the application to indicate the claim;

(However, ‘creditor' and ‘debtor' will be regarded as ‘Defendant'. And the plaintiff's claim was corrected to the same extent as the order of the Busan District Court Decision 2008Kadan21811, which is the judgment in a prior suit.' / [Grounds for Recognition] Gap's each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. As to the Defendants’ assertion 1), the Defendants asserted that the statute of limitations of the instant claim had expired and expired. However, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Defendants succeeded to the assets and liabilities of Busan 2 Mutual Savings Bank after Busan 2 Mutual Savings Bank, which is the original creditor, instead of the assets and liabilities of Busan 2 Mutual Savings Bank

With respect to the instant claim, Busan District Court Decision 2008Kadan21811 filed a lawsuit against the Defendants for a loan claim, and the judgment in favor of the Plaintiff was rendered on June 18, 2008. This judgment can be recognized as the facts established on July 22, 2008. Since the instant payment order was filed on August 24, 2017, the ten-year extinctive prescription period was expired, the Defendants’ assertion that the extinctive prescription has expired cannot be accepted.

2. Accordingly, the Defendants are obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money set forth in the Disposition No. 1.