1. The Defendant, on March 2008, got the victim X to take the Z construction of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “Y.”

In the summer, the construction work should be commenced with the permission of the Sungdong-gu Office before the error is entered, and there is no design cost, so the design drawing has not been completed.

The design cost of KRW 30,000,000 was lent to the principal parking lot, which reads that the civil engineering part among the construction works of the parking lot would be subcontracted without a mold to the original Gangwon Construction Co., Ltd.

However, in fact, the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Z Corporation is a construction project that requires permission, etc. from the Seongdong-gu Office or the construction department, and the defendant was not in the situation where design drawings, etc. were not prepared due to the fact that the design drawings, etc. were found to be possible to obtain permission, etc. from the above construction project with AA, etc. or the design office

In addition, the defendant was thought to use the design cost lent by the victim for personal purposes because there was no special income, and the defendant was urged by the wife to pay debts from the wife.

However, if the Defendant borrowed the Defendant’s design cost of KRW 30 million to the victim, the part of the civil engineering works in the parking lot will be subcontracted by the original Gangwon Construction Corporation.

On April 22, 2008, the deceiving was issued KRW 30 million as design expenses by the AC architectural office in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government AB Building 401.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. A perjury;