2. The judgment requires strict liability against the defendant in that the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case even though the defendant had been subject to criminal punishment of fines twice for the same kind of crime in the past. However, in full view of the fact that the defendant has committed the crimes in this case even though he/she had the past history of being sentenced to criminal punishment of fines, the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, the amount of individual damage is not relatively heavy, the defendant has no criminal records above the suspension of execution, the defendant has no criminal records above the suspension of execution, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment, and the circumstances after the crime, and the scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.