beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.09.10 2014고합185

뇌물수수

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of 6 months and 4 million won, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of 8 months and 6.6 million won, and Defendant E.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was a public official who served as the NMaritime Safety Facilities and the officer of the maritime affairs and fisheries. In the N located in O around March 8, 201, the Defendant received KRW 1,000,000 from the representative director of P, Inc., Ltd., a company engaging in the construction business of exhibition facilities, for the purpose of providing information and convenience on the business being promoted by the said company, from Q, and received KRW 2,00,000 from the above Q three times from that time to February 6, 2014, as indicated in the attached list of crimes (1), Nos. 1, 2, and 5.

Accordingly, the defendant received 2,00,000 won as a public official in relation to his duties.

2. Defendant B was a public official working as a NN safety facility and a technical officer belonging to the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries on March 19, 2009, and received KRW 2,000,000 from the above Q to provide business-related information and convenience, etc. in connection with his duties, as well as received KRW 3,300,000 from the above Q to December 4, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant received 3,300,000 won as a public official in connection with his duties.

3. Defendant E is a public official working for the Korea Maritime Safety Authority and the competent broadcasting and communications officer, etc. Around April 2010, the Defendant received KRW 500,000 from the above Q in relation to his/her duties under the name of providing information and convenience related to the projects being promoted by the said Q, and received KRW 3,50,000 in total from the above Q six times from around September 7, 2013, as indicated in the annexed crime sight table (5) Nos. 1 through 3, 5, and 7.

Accordingly, the defendant received 3,500,000 won as a public official in connection with his duties.

Summary of Evidence

【Court No. 1】

1. Defendant ..