When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall receive any money or valuables under the pretext of solicitation or mediation with respect to cases or affairs handled by a public official, and even if the defendant receives money from the victim C to the investigator of the public prosecutor's office with respect to cases in which the victim filed a complaint, he/she did not have the ability or intent to use the said money to the investigator of the public prosecutor's office in connection with such cases.

Nevertheless, on June 23, 2014, the Defendant, prior to the new bank ATM date located in the Seoul Southern District Court 1st, Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government District Court 2014, by deceiving the victim to the effect that “The other party appointed an attorney-at-law with respect to the case in which the party filed a complaint, but the party did not appoint an attorney-at-law, and that the party did not appoint an attorney-at-law. 5 million won in his face to the public prosecutor’s office, there is a person who is going to know on the side of the public prosecutor’s office, so that the trial of the case in which the party filed a complaint is fair so that the party does not pay to the other party, and received KRW 5 million from the victim.”

After all, the Defendant received money from the victim under the pretext of solicitation or mediation concerning the cases or affairs handled by public officials as above, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Investigation report (Submission of a record);

1. Account transaction statement [The witness C reverses his/her statement on the date and time he/she has given money to the defendant, but he/she has received a card theory and consistently stated that he/she had given it before the branch court of the South Korean District Court of the branch court of the ATM. In light of the fact that the contents of text messages and recording received by the witness and the defendant correspond to the above witness's statement, the above witness's statement in court is credibility] is applicable to the law.

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;