However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

After the former Incheon City C was prosecuted for committing the act of attacking the victim E and detained on February 22, 2012, the first instance court sentenced on three years to imprisonment with prison labor on February 22, 2012, the Defendant knowingly received a proposal from the Dong F of Dong C in Jung-gu to provide economic benefits, such as redevelopment project rights and expenses, and received a written application for non-execution of punishment under the name of the victim for C through G, G and H, who is the seat of G, and received a written application for non-execution of punishment from the victim.

On March 3, 2012, the Defendant introduced F, while having H, G, and K in the vicinity of the International Hospital located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant stated that “F may have an interest in redevelopment projects, which are punished in Jung-gu through F, upon receipt of an application for no punishment for C, the Defendant may have an interest in the redevelopment projects, which is punishable in Jung-gu.” The Defendant stated that “ even if a victim is injured and detained in an officetel or underground office, the Defendant would have received a written agreement, and the F would have changed to KRW 30 million as expenses,” and that “F would have received a request for a prompt penalty, after having known about the responsibility for and payment of expenses.”

G) Around March 22, 2012, according to the above resolution, G was found to be the D Land Partitioning Association office located in Jung-gu in Incheon, Jung-gu along with H et al., and G showed the victim's correspondence for about one hour, and H was stated to the effect that H was using an increase and “a request to prepare an application for a non-use of punishment in the name of the cooperative for the purpose of C” to the victim. In order to prepare an application for non-use of punishment in the name of the association from the victim, G heard the statement that the resolution of the board of directors is required and completed one week at the office once.

G A around March 30, 2012, the head of the partnership could not have only the head of the partnership if he/she was aware of an application for punishment,” who sought from the victim the statement that “the board of directors failed to open the meeting as a quorum.”

It is necessary to make a decision to leave our work.

No match is possible.