2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s duly admitted and investigated evidence, the Defendant may be recognized as having abused the victim.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

(1) The aggrieved person consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the original trial, “A defendant who takes a bath shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor.”

“The statements of witnesses G and H correspond to the statements of witnesses, and the said witnesses made a false statement;

There is no evidence to see.

② Although CCTV images did not directly take the face of violence, according to the above images, many nurses gather at the scene of crime, and it is confirmed that security personnel are rapidly dispatched to the scene of crime. As such, as Defendant’s defense counsel, it does not seem that only the Defendant had expressed a little desire for the victim.

③ The witness C of the lower court did not look at the victim.

“Although the Defendant made a statement, C was in the sick room at the time of assaulting the victim in the corridor, this cannot be followed by the credibility of the said statement by the victim, etc.

(4) The Defendant asserts that the contents of the first complaint prepared by the injured party and the facts constituting the crime of the original judgment are contradictory, but the facts constituting the crime as stated in the text of the judgment are simplifiedly arranged by the accused and by the investigative agency and the statements made by the injured party.

⑤ The Defendant asserts that there was no injury that the victim suffers from medical treatment for two weeks at the time of assault on the floor of hand, and that there was no injury that the victim suffers, and that there was a medical accident that may cause blood transfusion by injecting a large amount of sprinklers erroneously.

There is a fact that a victim has been issued a medical certificate, but the defendant is not an injury.