A. On August 21, 2012, the Plaintiff Company held the board of directors in Ulsan-gu F on August 21, 2012. At the time, H, H, and Defendant B, and Defendant C, who were directors of the Plaintiff Company, were present at the time, and passed a resolution (hereinafter “the resolution of the board of directors of this case”) on the following matters with the unanimous consent of all directors present at the meeting (hereinafter “the resolution of this case”).

The proposal of the meeting minutes of the board of directors set forth in subparagraph 1: (a) the creditor (Defendant C-20 million won, H-200 million won, Defendant D-200 million won, Defendant E- 250 million won, Defendant B-50 million won, and 1 billion won in total) shall prepare a statement of payment under the same conditions as attached documents, and shall make the said statement of payment to the creditor (Defendant C-20 million won, Defendant D-200 million won, Defendant E-7,000 won, Defendant E-7,000 won, and Defendant C-2, which are owned by the company, to set up a collateral mortgage on the above condition as attached documents. (b) The above condition is to set up 5,00 shares, Defendant D-13,80 shares, Defendant E-7,200 shares, and 6,000 shares out of Defendant C-20 shares under the name of the representative director of the company, Defendant C-owned, and transfer or acquire them by transfer.

3) Whether Defendant E’s shares were transferred or taken over under Defendant B’s name, once again transferred or taken over under the name of the representative director of the Plaintiff Company under the name of Defendant C, and the representative director is transferred or taken over by Defendant C. (4) The said representative director, subject to receiving the said shares, shall endeavor to enable the said creditors to pay to the maximum maximum amount of the maximum amount of the maximum amount of the maximum amount of the debt within the time limit of one billion won to the Plaintiff Company’s land, and to faithfully implement the business.

5 The above obligees have conditions to assist the representative director C to create the maximum profit for the business of the above plaintiffs' company.

The chief executive officer explained the above contents to Defendant C, and the voting method so determined as an inorganic input fee and approved all the participants as a result of voting.

B. The Plaintiff Company is the board of directors on August 22, 2012.