When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 9, 2016, around 15:35, the Defendant, at 151, as Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, 151, the home plug 3rd parking lot located in the 11st head of the household, was removed and stolen by 2 luminous half-ray Stick at the market value of 100,000 won attached to the stringer and the back stringer of the 100,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. Vehicles of victims, photographs of the scene of occurrence, and articles seized;

1. Application of the statutes governing seizure records and the list of seizure lists;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime five times, and that the Defendant committed a second offense without being well aware, even though he was under the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime.

However, a fine shall be imposed only once in consideration of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided and does not repeat the crime, the damage is relatively minor, the amount of damage is repaid to the victim and the agreement is reached, and the punishment shall be determined in the same manner as the order is issued.