If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

The Defendant had operated the English language room with the victim D from October 2015 to April 2016, and damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as follows.

1. On November 2015, the Defendant stated to the effect that “it would interfere with the operation of a public book room due to fluences with D’s students and snow” to croc G within F located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

However, there was no fact that the injured person committed a bad behavior, such as putting a school system with students in the school.

2. From around April 2016, the Defendant stated that “D is complicated and disturbed in male relations” to F operators H and Coco G from around F as stated in paragraph 1 of this Article.

However, there was no violation of privacy.

3. On May 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in the official book of the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) “Dricked his life with all races of all countries in the world so far; and (c) among them, he was able to be locked with Blacks.

Hadra

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, there was no fact that the victim had a locked life for all the human beings.

Summary of Evidence

1. The recording of each statement by witnesses D or G recorded in the recording file of the system of statutory recording in the third public trial records, and by witnesses I, H and J recorded in the recording file of the system of statutory recording in the fourth public trial records;

1. Statement protocol and petition filed by the police with D;

1. Each statement (I, G, H, and J);

1. Recording Book (No. 2016. Jun. 20, 2016) / The defendant was a complainant (D) / his/her employee.

G argues to the effect that the defendant created or distorted an unwritten speech by drawing the official book of the defendant.

However, according to the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, H present as the witness of this case as the witness of this case had been able to assist the Defendant in the operation of the public book.

F Operators, G, in F within F operated by H, Defendant Twitners, and I shall be an employee of the Defendant.