대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion was lent to the defendant on May 5, 2005, KRW 20 million on June 19, 2005, and KRW 40 million on June 19, 2005, respectively, and received reimbursement of KRW 15 million among them.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the remaining 45 million won and delay damages to the plaintiff.
2. Although the Plaintiff submitted the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (each cash tea certificate) as evidence, each of the above evidence cannot be used as evidence since there is no evidence to acknowledge the authenticity, and there is no other evidence to prove that the Plaintiff lent money to the Defendant.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.