However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) provided two can can can can cans and cans and cans and sell one disease to five customers, including D, at the above singing practice room around March 20, 2013; (b) around April 22:45, 2013, the Defendant sold six cans and bes to three customers in his name in the singing practice room. (c) A singing practice room business operator is prohibited from selling or providing alcoholic beverages. (c) A singing practice room business operator violated the obligations of a singing practice room business operator. (d) Around April 22:45, 2013, the Defendant violated the obligations of a singing practice room business operator.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Request for administrative disposition and report on the occurrence thereof;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the control;

1. Article 34 (3) 2 of the Music Industry Promotion Act and Articles 22 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense (or, collectively, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1408