The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Defendant A is a person who operated a sexual traffic business establishment under the name of “G”, “H” by leasing the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ctel D, E, and F.

From the middle of November 2018 to August 8, 2019, the Defendant advertised to I/J, etc. of the above sexual traffic advertising site at the above sexual traffic business establishment, and ordered K/L and L, etc. waiting at the above heading room to receive 11/150,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from male customers who contacted with the above heading room and guide them to the above heading room, and let them look into the sexual organ of the customer.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. On August 6, 2019, Defendant B received 140,000 won for sexual traffic from M from Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ctel E, and had M take the sexual organ as hand and scambling it, thereby engaging in similar intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The second police interrogation protocol against Defendant A and each police interrogation protocol against Defendants B, M, N, and L;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (on-site photographs) and photographs of the control site;

1. A report on investigation (in cases of a lease contract, a list of occupants of officetels), a monthly rent contract for real estate (officetel), and a list of occupants;

1. Application of investigation report (verification of deposit money), copy of passbook (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 19 (2) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Defendant B: The punishment of acts of arranging sexual traffic, Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The suspended sentence (Defendant A) is advantageous to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act.