2. The facts that the Defendant recognized and reflected each of the instant crimes, disposed of the otoba used for the crime after each of the instant crimes, and the driving distance is relatively short, are favorable.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, background of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate and is too unreasonable, and thus, it does not seem that the defendant's unfair assertion of the sentencing of this case is too unreasonable, on the grounds that the defendant's punishment is deemed inappropriate, since it is too unreasonable, the defendant's punishment of the crime of this case is not justified, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 6 months on April 14, 201; and (b) the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case during the suspension of execution under the sentence of 6 years of imprisonment

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.