beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.04.14 2016나208220

총회결의무효확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, this Court’s reasoning is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following cases. Thus, this Court’s reasoning is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

[Attachment] The May 20th of the judgment of the court of first instance is referring to F as “F”.

The 7th day of the first instance judgment “from March 2013” appears to be “from May 2013”.

The 8th judgment of the first instance court is the sole basis for seeking confirmation of existence, which is the 4th judgment of the first instance court.

The 8th 14 and 15th 15th 8th 15th 15th 10 of the first instance judgment “no evidence exists to acknowledge that the Plaintiff was elected as the vice-chairperson at the Defendant’s general meeting or selected as the vice-chairperson at the Defendant’s meeting of the board of directors.”

2. As such, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and thus dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.