If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is the driver of the 6-Ban-motor vehicle (one-time Ban-motor vehicle) for business use.

1. On May 21, 2012, around 14:47, the Defendant: (a) received approximately KRW 7 km from the old in the front of Samsung C&J apartment in the C&M apartment and the front in front of the C&M apartment in the C&M in the C&M in the C&M in the C&M in the P&M in the P&M area of A.M. to the front of the C&M apartment in the C&M in the C&M in the mountain of A.M.; and (b) received KRW 6

2. On May 23, 2012, around 22:08, the Defendant received KRW 3,000 as transportation charges for passengers who were not in possession of freight using the above truck from the upper end of Samsung C&M apartment in the front end of Samsung C&M apartment and the upper end of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the cryst of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on commercial transport services;

1. Comprehensive details of vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment to the closure data of dynamic images);

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and subparagraph 1 of Article 90 of the Passenger Transport Service Act that choose a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are recognized to be erroneous by the defendant; although the defendant was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment once for the same kind of crime, there is no previous conviction; and all other circumstances constituting conditions for sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, etc