except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 10:30 on May 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) viewed the victim E (the age of 44) and the car sales company’s acquisition on the ground that, while talking about the issue of the victim, the Defendant brought about the victim’s bMW car acquisition, and (b) caused the victim’s head, shoulder, blick, and blick part, which are dangerous objects in his bMW car back on his bMW car back, resulting in the victim’s injury, such as two open flick, which requires the victim’s treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation ( normal consideration such as the point agreed upon and the degree of damage);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;