사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On January 11, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended execution in August of the same month due to a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Jeonju District Court's Military Accounting Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 19th of the same month.
The defendant is the relationship that he was aware of while working together in the modern middle industry, which is located in the victim C and Gunsan-si.
1. On February 2015, the Defendant, at the company around February 2015, would have to resolve a guarantee to obtain a 30 million won loan from the victim.
The phrase “the phrase was false.”
However, at the time, the defendant was liable for approximately KRW 50 million, and the victim was thought to use the money borrowed by having the joint and several surety as private sports soil and gambling funds, entertainment expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan.
Around February 24, 2015, the Defendant enticed the victim, and caused the victim to borrow a total of KRW 36 million from the loan to the victim, namely, the Defendant’s joint and several liability around February 24, 2015; the KON loan to the KON loan to the KON Co., Ltd.; on March 17, 2015; on March 19, 2015; and on March 26, 2015, the Defendant acquired an equivalent amount of property benefits by having the victim borrow a total of KRW 6 million from the loan to the KBF loan to the KBF loan.
2. The Defendant, at the same place as before and after June 2015, intends to move the victim to a low interest rate because the interest of the existing lending enterprise is too high.
7 million won to be repaid with a loan is changed.
However, at the time, the Defendant was liable for approximately KRW 50 million, and the Defendant was thought to use the borrowed money from the injured party as private sports soil and gambling funds, entertainment expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan.
The defendant deceivings the victim and is under his control.