2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant, who was a party to a divorce lawsuit, recklessly opened a postal item in front of the victim, thereby infringing the victim’s secrets; (b) such behavior is difficult to be deemed to simply deliver the content to the victim; and (c) comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances leading to the commission of the crime, circumstances after the crime, family relationship, etc. and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, circumstances after the crime, family relationship, etc., the Defendant’s mistake is recognized; and (d) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment not only once sentenced to a fine for a violation of

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.