If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

【200 High Court Decision 395】

1. On August 16, 2019, at around 20:15, the Defendant: (a) stolen, using the gaps in which surveillance was neglected at the 1st floor C store in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B department store; (b) with one disease of a Crener amounting to KRW 61,000, which was maintained by the victim D (year 24, female).

2. At around 20:20 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) stolen the 284,000 won, which was managed by the victim F (32 years of age, women) displayed at the above 20:20,000, by taking advantage of the gaps in surveillance negligence in the cosmetic E shop on the 1st floor of the above B department store.

3. On the 17th day of the same month, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in which surveillance was neglected in the food pipes of the first floor underground of the above B department store; (b) thereby cutting down by using a cresh in which the sum amounting to KRW 6,600 managed by the victim G (hereinafter referred to as 60 years of age, women) who was displayed there; (c) one string of coconuted 1, 7,000 won; (d) one string of coconuted 1, 4,900 won; and (d) one string of 2,500 won.

[2020, 396] On September 4, 2019, the Defendant, at H 15:30 on the 15:30th, placed two of the clothes worth KRW 29,800 in shopping bags in total, including one of the 19,900, the inner clothes market price, 900, and one of the 9,900, in the inner clothes market price, using the gaps in which the management by the victim JJ, the store manager, was neglected.

[200 high-level955] The Defendant visited “L” to B department stores K stores 1st underground, and the victim M (n, 33 years old) is the point of “L”.

On August 18, 2019, around 13:50 on August 13:50, 2019, the Defendant was engaged in as if he did not have an intent or ability to pay the food value in the “L” of the first floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B department store B department store K stores, and he did not receive approximately KRW 40,000,000 from the victim and did not pay the price.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to 40,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

【200 High Court Decision 395】

1. Written statements of G, N,D, and F are prepared as investigation reports (verification of CCTVs in generated areas), investigation reports (collection of damaged items) (2020 high-level 396).