손실보상금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On June 29, 2017, a decision of recommending reconciliation was finalized as of June 29, 2017 with respect to the rest of the plaintiffs except the plaintiffs A, following the ruling.
Project approval and public announcement - Project name: B-project redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as "project of this case"): Defendant - Public announcement: Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public announcement on July 3, 2014
B. The date of expropriation on December 18, 2015 - The date of expropriation on February 5, 2016: Ddong-dong Seoul (hereinafter “Ddong-dong”) in Seongbuk-gu (hereinafter “Ddong-dong”) owned by the Plaintiff: The Plaintiff is entitled to increase the amount of compensation for the said land among the compensation items - The Plaintiff is entitled to increase the amount of compensation for the said land, and thus the amount of compensation is omitted: the amount of compensation for the instant land presented by the Defendant, who is the project implementer, as the Plaintiff, as the amount of compensation for the instant land; the Seoul Regional Land Expropriation Committee decided that the said amount of compensation is larger than the appraised amount of the instant land.
- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation for a corporation and an appraisal corporation for a Dong;
C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on September 29, 2016 - The Central Land Tribunal dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection related to the compensation.
- An appraisal corporation: Each entry into the new appraisal corporation in the future of the corporation, and the three appraisal corporations in the corporation, and the three appraisal appraisers in the above appraisal corporations (hereinafter referred to as the "adjudication appraiser", and the result of the appraisal in the appraisal in the case of the above appraisal appraisal in the case of the adjudication / [based on recognition] of the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 6 through 9 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings;
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion appraisal is assessed as a site on which 80 square meters are registered as a land category among 112 square meters of the instant land, and the remaining 32 square meters of land (hereinafter “instant main part”) is assessed as a private road and assessed as an amount of compensation.