On July 31, 2013, the F mobile phone between the defendant and the plaintiff A is a new service contract and a terminal.

A. Nonparty H was convicted of the following facts constituting the crime:

(A) P. P. P. P. L M M M M M L L, K K K K K K K L L L L L L L L L L P

B. 1) The “M” No. 1 in the table 1 of the crime day table 1 of the above gambling part refers to Plaintiff C (Plaintiff A’s woman). The mobile phone number relevant to this refers to Q and “G.” No. 2, 3, and 6 of the same sequence 2, 6 of the same table 2, 3, and 6 refers to Plaintiff A, and the mobile phone number relevant to this refers to Plaintiff A (R No. 2). The mobile phone number related to this refers to R (S No. 2), S (S. 3), and F (F).

3) The “O” set forth in the same Nos. 7 and 8 refers to Plaintiff B (the wife of Plaintiff A) and the mobile phone numbers related thereto are “T” (No. 7) and “U” (No. 8). 4) The “P” set forth in the same Nos. 9 is the Plaintiff E (the remainder of Plaintiff A) and the cell phone numbers related thereto are “V”.

C. The details of the current unpaid amount for each plaintiff are as follows.

The plaintiff (including short-term unpaid amounts) of unpaid total amount of short-term payments at the end of the net time.

1. AR No. 0 (Receipt-586,610) of the first line 0 S 0 of the instant second line 0 (Receipt-602,590) F 442,530 of the instant third line 442,530,530 of the Plaintiff

2. B 0 U 0 on the fourth line of this case (customers' full payment - 756,830) 0 on the fourth line of this case 0 (customers' full payment - 757,630)

3. CW 6th line 0 (agency compensation-585,480) G 0 G 7th line 24,570 519,260

4. The 0th line 8th line 0 (agency compensation-618,380) of this case 0

5. EV instant 0th line 0 (customers’ full payment -1,067,050) 0

(d)The details of receipt by each line shall be as follows:

The plaintiff who is not paid to the customer of the meeting number on a net basis

1. The plaintiff who is unpaid as of the end price of the third line 570,690 won, which is collected separately from the insurance company of the first line 677,240 won, in addition to KRW 586,610,00 from the insurance company of the second line 691,630 won;

2. B: The customer paid the end price of KRW 3,670,070, the end price of KRW 3,670,000 to the end price of KRW 985,290;

3. C It is a judgment on the identity theft of the sixth line 6.67,020 won.