However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 24, 2015, the defendant driving a B car around 08:20 on December 24, 2015, and changing the lane into a two-lane, where the three-lane roads in front of the D, located in Ulsan-gu C, Ulsan-do, toward the industrial tower protection area from the two-lanes, the vehicle zone was changed to a two-lane at a speed of about 60 kilometers per hour.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has the duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by putting an advance notice of change of course, etc. prior to the change of course, and when it is likely to impede normal traffic of other vehicles, he/she has the duty of care not to change the course.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to maintain the safety distance from the surrounding vehicle without giving an advance notice of a change in course, and immediately changed the vehicle from the three lanes to the two lanes, due to occupational negligence, which did not give a proper view of the right and the right and the right of the vehicle. The part of the victim E (25 years old) driving in front of the right side of the FF vehicle of the victim E (25 years old) which was moving from the one-lane to the two-lane, followed the Defendant’s vehicle to the left side side of the driver’s vehicle, and followed the victim G (59 years old) driving that was stopped to allow passengers to board the vehicle on the three-lane.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) inflicted an injury on the victim E, such as scopical salt in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment; (b) injury on the scopical scopical scopical scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics (15).