However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 10, 2012, the Defendant issued KRW 17,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 1,800,000, KRW 1,800, KRW 80,000, KRW 1,800, KRW 80,000, KRW 80, KRW 80,000, KRW 16,000, KRW 16,00,00, KRW 1,000, KRW 80,00, KRW 16,00,00, KRW 30,00, KRW 50, and 10,000, KRW 5,00, at the market price of the victim in the subject matter, owned by the Defendant, and the Defendant lost the keys’s key to D.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property amounting to 4,143,000 won in total of the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statements of E and D;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (calculated amount of damage);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (the execution of a punishment shall be suspended at once, taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that there is no record of punishment for larceny in spite of the fact that it has been punished three times, and the nature of the crime of larceny is not good, but confession and reflects, the victim has reached an agreement with the victim, and there is no special criminal record in addition to a fine);