A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, and Defendant C by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

1. On October 9, 2012, around 13:35, Defendant A sold to customers under a name-free will-free will-be an over-the-counter medication, even if the G pharmacy located in Busan, Busan, and was not a pharmacist, Defendant A received and sold KRW 2,000.

Accordingly, the Defendant sold medicines even though he is not a pharmacy founder.

2. Around December 21, 2012, Defendant B received 3,000 won a curfeception, an over-the-counter customer, even though it is not a pharmacist, from an I pharmacy located in the Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do.

Accordingly, the Defendant sold medicines even though he is not a pharmacy founder.

3. The Defendant C sold drugs to the Defendant at the same time and place as above 1 and 2, and even if the Defendant’s employees A and B were not a pharmacy founder, respectively, with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each accusation (including attached statements, video images, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as regards ctv attached to the charge) and investigation reports (as regards ctv attached to the charge);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A and B: Each of the provisions of Article 93(1)7 and Article 44(1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act and the choice of fines

(b) Defendant C: Articles 97, 93(1)7, and 44(1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant C);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;