However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A shall be for two years.

1. On January 2, 2019, Defendant A suffered from the victim B (the age of 56) of the shares purchased at the Defendant’s request from the victim B (the age of 56) in Gyeyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a tension of the sprink, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the face of the victim due to drinking.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph (1), Defendant B suffered bodily injury, i.e., the victim A (the age of 58)’s assault, and the victim’s spawn, which was a dangerous object on the floor, caused two weeks of treatment to the victim when following the victim’s back water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 258-2(1) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B’s discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines for a crime committed by a defendant A [Article 1] and the general injury [Article 1] general injury [Special Punishment] and the elements of mitigation: The area of mitigation [the scope of recommendations and recommendations], the area of mitigation of punishment [the area of recommendation and the scope of punishment], the number of special injury and repeated crimes committed by a defendant B [Type 1] and the number of special injury and repeated crimes committed by a defendant B [the number of punishment] from February to October [the number of punishment]: The area of mitigation of punishment [the scope of recommendation area and recommendation range], the area of mitigation of punishment [the area of recommendation and recommendation range], the area of imprisonment for

2. In addition, considering favorable circumstances such as the nature and degree of the injury in this case, the Defendants recognized each of the crimes in this case, against their mistake, and the fact that the Defendants did not want to be punished, the part and degree of the injury in this case, the Defendants’ previous conviction, age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime.