When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 21, 2014, at around 21:00, the defendant's office of Busan Shipping Daegu B Apartment 307, reported by B apartment security guards to perform an act of disturbance of drinking at the defendant's office, and the security guards assigned to the shipping police station C police box and the slope E called the above apartment.

On the same day, the police officers, at around 21:15, found the defendant's wife F at the entrance of the apartment, at the request of the F, "I will see the defendant's wife F at the entrance of the apartment, and I will see that I will go to the house in order to do violence."

However, the Defendant did not open the doors to the police officers such as “Nice’s seat, sark,” and did not open the doors to the above police officers, and thus, the above police officers opened the door again, and the sarrier, the Defendant, and the Defendant assaulted the police officers by displaying the drinking that they opened the front door to the face of E by the above police officers.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a public official performing his duties, interfered with legitimate execution of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of the above E crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;