1. On December 4, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the net Incheon Branch of the Gwangju District Court on April 18, 2008, a fine of four million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the same court on April 18, 2008, and seven million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the same court on March 25, 2013.

On May 14, 2019, around 00:23, the Defendant driven a Cran-car under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.180% without a car driver’s license at approximately 14 km section from the 14 km section to the 10.4 km-si.

2. When the Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph (1) above, took effect on the slope E affiliated with the Jeonnam Provincial Police Agency D due to drunk driving, etc., he stated F’s name and resident registration number as if he were f, and subsequently made up a statement in the driver’s statement column of the situation report on the driver’s statement of the principal driver, the Defendant arbitrarily stated F’s name and entered F’s name in the driver’s statement column of the situation report on the driver’s statement of the principal driver, signed next to it, forged a copy of the report on the former driver’s statement in the F’s name, which is a private document related to the certificate, and exercised the forged private document by delivering

3. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph 1 above, signed the “F” at will using a device pen when, after entering the F personal information of the Defendant and the details of the violation, the Defendant, who misleads the Defendant as F in a portable device (PDA) with the foregoing circumstances, and demanding the Defendant to sign the “F” on the driver’s signature column of the notification screen as a result of the drinking driving control.

Accordingly, with the intention of making business conduct an error, the defendant has forged the F's confirmation of the driver of F's notification of the result of drinking driving control in the name of F, which is a prior record of certification of facts.