절도
Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.
1. On August 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft in a way that: (b) around 14:00, the victim C’s house in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, B apartment house 103, the victim’s house c, and (c) entered a real estate employee with real estate, using a gap in which the surveillance of the said victim was neglected; (d) using a fluort in a digital camera that was posted on a small book, and (e) using a fluort fluor, which was located on a digital camera room, in the market price of KRW 1,00,000,000, in the middle of 14:35 L, serial number: 4591486).
2. According to the records, on July 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and ten months in the case of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Habitual thief) at the Busan District Court 2015 Inventory 63, Busan District Court 63, Oct. 2, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 2, 2015, and the crime of habitual larceny in the above final judgment was found to have been committed by the Defendant at the victim E office of the victim E, 105 (105) around Jun. 30, 2013, the Defendant sought deposit and opened a password with the real estate broker F at the time of entering the victim’s house with the victim’s house at the time of reporting the password of the victim’s house entrance input at the victim’s house, with the sum of the market price owned by the victim inside the said house at KRW 380,500,180 k.
From June 3, 2013 to October 30, 2013, the Defendant stolen the victims’ property amounting to KRW 28,420,000 in total, on ten occasions, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.
"" is the same.
According to the above facts, the facts charged in this part of the charges of habitual larceny for which the above judgment became final and conclusive, and the facts charged prior to the above judgment were committed by the Defendant in light of the means and methods of the crime, time, and the Defendant’s previous convictions. Thus, the facts charged prior to the above judgment are the facts charged of habitual larceny for which the above judgment was rendered, and this part of the charges prior to the pronouncement of the judgment.