When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2] On December 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on December 24, 2013, and on December 4, 2014, the same court received a sentence of 8 months for the same crime, and the said sentence became final and conclusive on September 8, 2015, and the said suspended sentence became null and void, and the execution of each of the above sentence was completed at the Speaker’s prison on September 8, 2015. On March 23, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Western District Court for the same crime, and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Kimcheon Juvenile Prison on December 5, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Embezzlements of deserted articles in possession;

A. On December 16, 2016, at around 10:00, the Defendant acquired a copy of the 297 upper-class bus stop near the Seoul Jung-gu 297 upper-class bus stop, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s thought to be used without taking necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim, even though he/she acquired a copy of the 3rd class C’s physical card (credit number D) in the name of the victim who was lost by the victim C.

B. On January 2017, the Defendant, at an influent area in Seoul, found one chapter of the Cit Bank St Bank’s St Bank’s card (credit number F) in the name of the victim owned by the victim E, but did not take necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim, and embezzled the Defendant’s thought to be used.

2. Violation of Acts in financial business specializing in fraud and credit;

A. On December 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit Financial Business due to the use of the Postal Card in Korea’s Bank (1) from the point of “H,” operated by the victim in the name in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant purchased brea at the market price of KRW 3,000, and presented the brea card lost to the Defendant as if he had a legitimate right to use the brea card, thereby allowing the victim to pay the brea value with the above brea card, thereby using the said card and having the victim pay the said brea value.