2. In determining whether the Defendant caused a traffic accident, thereby causing human and material damage, and escape without taking any measure, and thereby creating a quality of the crime, not only is the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary measures after an accident) in 2014, but also is punished as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary measures after an accident) in 2015, and a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) in 2015, and there is a tendency to view traffic safety.

However, it is relatively minor that the defendant inflicted injury on the victims, and agreed with the victims, and the defendant was punished twice for the same crime in the last three years, but was punished only as a fine.

In addition, considering the various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, method, and consequence of the crime, which are shown in records and pleadings, the sentence of the court below is not recognized to have reached the degree of unfairness because it is too unfasible and unfair.

Therefore, it is difficult to accept the prosecutor's argument.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.