The sentencing of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant while making a confession of all of the crimes of this case, etc., the defendant has a history of criminal punishment more than 15 times in total, including the past record of punishment more than 10 times for the same crime. In particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for the same crime, and in light of the sentencing of the same similar case, the court below appears to have determined the punishment by considering the favorable circumstances for the defendant in light of the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., and considering the various circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be deemed that the sentencing of

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition