If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who lives in apartment B.

On June 28, 2016, the defendant requested the management office to operate heating at the Kimpo-si B management office around 22:36, but refused, the defendant left the office of the management office managed by the above apartment management office of the victim who suffered damage from chemical damage, and damaged two copies of the glass windows so that the maintenance costs of the market price can be observed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the investigative report (in-person investigation of a victim), investigation report (the confirmation of the floor in which the suspect resides with the apartment building), one room for using the suspect elevator, one head of the investigation report (in relation to securing the list of occupants), one list of occupants, and one copy of the list of occupants, and the report of investigation (specific

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act in relation to criminal facts and the choice of a fine (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1448, Apr. 1, 201)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;