However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 17, 2020, the first fire-fighting Defendant was only the “Cdong,” and according to the evidence examined by the court, the crime of this case was committed not within the apartment complex but within the premises of the apartment complex, and it cannot be deemed that it interfere with the Defendant’s defense right by recognizing it without any changes in the indictment.

The same applies hereinafter. During the year B, a fire was caused by the loss of cash and card in a wallet on the same day, by setting fire to the turf of the redy field managed by Siung-si with a turf attached to the turf of the redy field managed by Siung-si, resulting in a state of burning the fire attached to the redy field to the apartment, etc. in the vicinity of the redy field, thereby causing public danger by setting fire to the objects owned by others.

2. At around 01:00 on the same day, the second fire Defendant: (a) destroyed a part of the remaining dry field, which was managed by Siung-si, by means of a single-use dog in possession, by setting fire to the turth of the turdy field managed by Siung-si; (b) caused a state of burning a fire attached to the said turdy field to nearby apartment buildings, etc.; and (c) caused public danger by setting fire to others’ property.

3. Around 01:14 on the same day, the third fire-prevention Defendant destroyed part of the remaining dry field, which was managed from a green area for viewing and viewing by setting fire to the turdy field, and caused danger to the public by setting fire to another person’s property and causing danger to the public by setting fire to the turdy field, by setting fire to the turdy field managed from a green area for viewing and viewing through a single-use dog.

(i) the evidence;