The Defendant, who is engaged in the business of selling and selling high water, powder, metal, etc. in Sungnam-si, and purchased 200 kggs from the victim F, which was stolen by “D,” around 09:0 on February 1, 2013, the Defendant purchased 40,000 gs from the Defendant’s negligence, even though he/she had a duty of care to verify the personal information of “D” and to know the acquisition of high water, etc., and acquired the stolen goods by purchasing 40,000 ggs from the Defendant’s negligence, by purchasing 40,000 gs from the Defendant’s “D”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused (including E in the second protocol);

1. Each police interrogation protocol of E (including theF statement in the third and fourth protocol);

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 364 and 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one day per 100,000 won);

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. According to Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence, the sentence against the defendant shall be suspended as ordered by the disposition, considering the fact that the defendant was committed by committing a crime and is committed by himself, and that he was an old and no criminal record.